The planners we want

On an academic planners listserve, there is currently a discussion over the increasing demands being placed on planning academics to get positions and tenure. In the midst of a critique of this approach, Peter Marcuse has suggested the following:

We want planners with imagination, with social values, with a desire to explore and investigate new frontiers and think of alternatives not already in the mainstream. We want planners who are personally sensitive to how others feel and act and are treated and affected by public and private policies with which they deal. That requires a life not confined to hours in libraries and in front of computers. If their career is to be in academia teaching, we want good teachers, teachers with empathy for their students, themselves engaged in doing what they preach, exciting teachers whose vision of good teaching goes beyond a sound syllabus and responses to specific assignments. We want planners who are excited about their work, dedicated to it as part of full and active personal as well as professional lives.

Comments

That is what they say they want. From what I've seen, what they really want is someone who publishes a lot, and someone who's willing to take on part-time academic work with no prospect of tenure :)

Actually, Peter is saying that this is what we, as planners, should want. The rest of his post makes it clear that other forces may get in the way.

Yes. Sorry. Sometimes the Internets make it too easy to be trigger-happy with

an o'erhasty comment :)